@article{HAN_2014, title={理解認同危機的另一種可能性: Another Possibility for Resolving the Bioethical Crisis}, volume={12}, url={https://ejournals.lib.hkbu.edu.hk/index.php/ijccpm/article/view/1576}, DOI={10.24112/ijccpm.121576}, abstractNote={<p><b>LANGUAGE NOTE</b> | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.</p><p>As modern bioethical consumers, we are responsible for developing positive solutions to the discipline’s identity crisis. In many cases, “four-principles” bioethics offers a guide for cross-cultural debate. Optimism is crucial for distinguishing specific moral rules and ultimate moral principles. The observations on which Professor Solomon’s theory is based do not demonstrate that the basic ethical principles of bioethics are culture-bound, merely that specific ethical rules are culture-bound.</p><p><b>DOWNLOAD HISTORY</b> | This article has been downloaded 87 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.</p>}, number={2}, journal={International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine}, author={HAN, Dan}, year={2014}, month={Jan.}, pages={131–134} }