@article{THAM_2022, title={生命倫理學:跨文化研究: Bioethics: Cross-Cultural Explorations}, volume={20}, url={https://ejournals.lib.hkbu.edu.hk/index.php/ijccpm/article/view/2238}, DOI={10.24112/ijccpm.202238}, abstractNote={<p><strong>LANGUAGE NOTE </strong>| Document text in English ; abstract also in Chinese.</p> <p>This paper explores the need for and place of input from local cultures and religious traditions when addressing the highly complex questions that frequently arise in the field of bioethics, something which is often overlooked and even questioned in much of the relevant academic literature. It begins by examining the historical roots of religious bioethics and the secularization of the discipline before then recounting the experience of the Bioethics, Multiculturalism and Religion Project of the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics and Human Rights. Over the past 12 years, this Project has brought together Christians, Buddhists, Confucians, Daoists, Jews, Hindus, Muslims, and secular ethicists in eight encounters to discuss bioethical topics. First, the paper describes the different orientations, goals and methodological changes involved in these encounters. The methodology of meeting evolving is a search for possible convergence or common ground in the Project. The paper then addresses the most salient questions that have emerged these years. They are i) the problem of universalism vs. pluralism, which is witnessed in global bioethics vs. local diversity; ii) the East-West divide on the conception of human rights vs. duties; iii) cross-cultural and interreligious dialogue goals are framed as convergence, consensus or conversation; and iv) the ongoing issue of science and faith as different traditions confront modernity.</p> <p>本文在探討解決生命倫理學領域經常出現的高度複雜問題時,當地文化和宗教傳統的涉入是必要的,也是應該具有一定地位的,但這一點在許多相關的學術文獻中卻經常被忽視,甚至被質疑。本文首先考察宗教生命倫理學的歷史根源和該學科的世俗化,然後敘述聯合國教科文組織生命倫理學和人權教席的“生命倫理學、多元文化與宗教”國際項目的經驗。在過去12年裡,該項目將基督教、佛教、儒教、道教、猶太教、印度教、穆斯林教及世俗倫理學的學者聚集在一起,進行了8次會議,討論生命倫理學課題。本文首先描述這些會議所涉及的不同取向、目標和方法論的演變。方法論的演變是為了尋求項目可能的趨同點或共同點。然後,本文討論這些年出現的最突出的問題。它們是:i)普遍主義與多元主義問題,即體現在全球生命倫理學與地方倫理學之間的問題;ii)東西方在人權與義務概念上的分歧;iii)跨文化和跨宗教對話的目標應該被框定為趨同、共識還是對談;以及iv)在不同傳統面對現代性時所持績存在的科學與信仰之間的問題。</p>}, number={2}, journal={International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine}, author={THAM, Joseph}, year={2022}, month={Dec.}, pages={13–37} }