有關有效治療和無效治療的概念和倫理爭端

Conceptual and Moral Disputes about Futile and Useful Treatments

Authors

  • Loretta M. KOPELMAN East Carolina University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.31389

Keywords:

無效, 倫理學, 醫生權力, 同意

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese

一系列病例使有關醫學治療何時有效、何時無效的爭端明確化、具體化，因而也使有關醫患關係、資源分配、醫患間的溝通交流、同情心、病痛的緩解、自主權、治療不足和治療過度、家長式的獨斷作風及姑息治療的爭端明確化、具體化。暸解有效和無效是相輔相成的概念，對我們的醫療實踐有益。對治療在爭議性病例是有效還是無效的判斷，有著共同的特點：（1）以醫學科學為依據；（2）反映多種價值；（3）處於或接近有效閾；（4）令人負擔沈重。我們應關注構成這些判斷基礎的經驗要素、倫理要素及評估要素的正當理由，而不是做出有關是醫生、病人，還是社會一致認同應成為最終決定因素的專橫決定。

DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 20 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2000-01-01

How to Cite

KOPELMAN, L. M. (2000). 有關有效治療和無效治療的概念和倫理爭端: Conceptual and Moral Disputes about Futile and Useful Treatments. International Journal of Chinese &Amp; Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, 3(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.31389

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2000)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2000 International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and not used for commercial purposes. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s) and the publisher(s).