理解認同危機的另一種可能性

Another Possibility for Resolving the Bioethical Crisis

Authors

  • 韓丹 (Dan HAN) 中國廣州醫科大學 (Guangzhou Medical University, CHINA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.121576

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.

As modern bioethical consumers, we are responsible for developing positive solutions to the discipline’s identity crisis. In many cases, “four-principles” bioethics offers a guide for cross-cultural debate. Optimism is crucial for distinguishing specific moral rules and ultimate moral principles. The observations on which Professor Solomon’s theory is based do not demonstrate that the basic ethical principles of bioethics are culture-bound, merely that specific ethical rules are culture-bound.

DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 87 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-01-01

How to Cite

HAN, D. (2014). 理解認同危機的另一種可能性: Another Possibility for Resolving the Bioethical Crisis. International Journal of Chinese &Amp; Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, 12(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.121576

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2014 International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and not used for commercial purposes. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s) and the publisher(s).