瀕死經驗的解釋及其在哲學上的限制

Near-Death Experience and the Limits of its Philosophical Implications

Authors

  • 冼偉林 (William SIN) 香港教育大學 (The Education University of Hong Kong, HONG KONG)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.141614

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.

The objective of this paper is to reject Kwan’s claim in his paper “Does the Soul Exist? What Near-Death Experiences Reveal.” As Kwan draws heavily on references from Pim van Lommel, I also reject van Lommel’s position. Kwan and van Lommel’s claim is that the phenomenon of NDE supports the view that people’s experiential content and their consciousness exist independently of their physical bodies. I raise three objections to Kwan. First, I argue that there is a fundamental difference between life and death; therefore, the phenomena of NDE may give us little idea of whether some form of experience exists after death. Second, there is no evidence that an NDE happens at the exact moment the patient’s body shuts down. Third, the potential biological and physiological explanations of NDE are excluded by Kwan and van Lammel without good reason, and the explanations they offer to replace them are far from convincing.

DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 181 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

SIN, W. (2016). 瀕死經驗的解釋及其在哲學上的限制: Near-Death Experience and the Limits of its Philosophical Implications. International Journal of Chinese &Amp; Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, 14(2), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.141614

Issue

Section

Articles