對譚文論證的一個反駁

An Objection to Tham's Argument

Authors

  • 王帥 (WANG Shuai) 深圳大學 (Shenzhen University, CHINA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.202247

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.

譚傑志 (JosephTham) 教授在其〈生命倫理學:跨文化的探索〉一文中對宗教在生命倫理學研究中被邊緣化的學術現象表達不滿。他提出如下主張作為結論:

(p)宗教可以為生命倫理學提出融貫的、實質性的和有意義的提議。(譚傑志 2022,33)

如果我對文章的論證結構沒有把握錯誤,這個命題的得出,首要地得益於如下3個命題的合取…… (撮要取自內文首段)

This short commentary focuses on the argumentative structure of Joseph Tham's paper “Bioethics: Cross-Cultural Explorations” and argues against his central assertion that “religion can make a coherent, substantive, and significant proposal for bioethics.” I will first reconstruct Tham's argument on his central assertion, then borrow some key propositions from Tham himself and apply them against his own argument, after which I will provide concluding remarks about his argument.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

WANG, S. (2022). 對譚文論證的一個反駁: An Objection to Tham’s Argument. International Journal of Chinese &Amp; Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, 20(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.202247

Issue

Section

Articles