Virtue Ethics and Medical Professionalism
Keywords:德性倫理, 醫療專業精神, 規則的道德, 德性的道德, 規則式的醫德觀, 以德性為本的醫德觀
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.
China faces many healthcare problems. Many people, such as experts Prof. William Hsiao and Li Ling, attribute these problems to the unregulated marketization of the country’s healthcare system. This paper argues that although the unregulated marketization of its healthcare system contributes to many of China’s healthcare problems, a lack of professionalism is also an important factor. Furthermore, it argues that the Chinese medical profession requires both regulation and professionalism. It focuses on the moral aspect of medical professionalism (i.e., medical professional ethics) by discussing the rule- and virtue-based approaches to ethics. Alasdair MacIntyre initially observed the differences between these two approaches in his book, After Virtue. This paper discusses how the two approaches can be used to flesh out rule- and virtue-based medical professional ethics. It argues that rule-based medical professional ethics encounter severe difficulties from which virtue-based medical professional ethics are immune, and that there is therefore an urgent need to research virtue-based medical professional ethics.
DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 358 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2014 International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The CC BY-NC 4.0 license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and not used for commercial purposes. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s) and the publisher(s).